Comments on: Jungian Whim http://www.davidmazure.com/2008/10/20/jungian-whim/ The artwork of David Mazure Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:41:04 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: Tj http://www.davidmazure.com/2008/10/20/jungian-whim/comment-page-1/#comment-273 Tj Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:06:56 +0000 http://www.davidmazure.com/?p=71#comment-273 Well Jung!! Well Jung!!

]]> By: David Mazure http://www.davidmazure.com/2008/10/20/jungian-whim/comment-page-1/#comment-266 David Mazure Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:25:55 +0000 http://www.davidmazure.com/?p=71#comment-266 Thanks, Mom! Ward: Uh. . .I don't know what to say. I was pretty much bullshitting in my response to Kyra. Although there is a book (that I am reading and it is pretty cool) called Consciousness Explained by Daniel Dennett, but there is no Algorithm of Consciousness (yet). But, I am certainly glad that it inspired some philosophical retrospection on your part (unless you are simply bullshitting me back!) Sue: Thanks for the compliments Sue! I'll try to refrain from sharing my opinions from now on! And please see my response to Ward's comment (above). Thanks, Mom!

Ward: Uh. . .I don’t know what to say. I was pretty much bullshitting in my response to Kyra. Although there is a book (that I am reading and it is pretty cool) called Consciousness Explained by Daniel Dennett, but there is no Algorithm of Consciousness (yet). But, I am certainly glad that it inspired some philosophical retrospection on your part (unless you are simply bullshitting me back!)

Sue: Thanks for the compliments Sue! I’ll try to refrain from sharing my opinions from now on! And please see my response to Ward’s comment (above).

]]> By: ward Klemer http://www.davidmazure.com/2008/10/20/jungian-whim/comment-page-1/#comment-265 ward Klemer Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:31:27 +0000 http://www.davidmazure.com/?p=71#comment-265 Dave, I kind of agree with Sue as far as your own pesonal comments; but in this case I'm glad you did: Mentioning Daniel Tennett rang a bell in my brain, so I did some memory research. After reading more of his stuff, I realized a little more where you are coming from: "out there" in a complimentary way. Keep up your own message. I have no problem with your comments....in some ways they may actually help me appreciate your work. I love to discuss any artists work with the artist. Dave, I kind of agree with Sue as far as your own pesonal comments; but in this case I’m glad you did: Mentioning Daniel Tennett rang a bell in my brain, so I did some memory research. After reading more of his stuff, I realized a little more where you are coming from: “out there” in a complimentary way. Keep up your own message. I have no problem with your comments….in some ways they may actually help me appreciate your work. I love to discuss
any artists work with the artist.

]]> By: Sue S. http://www.davidmazure.com/2008/10/20/jungian-whim/comment-page-1/#comment-264 Sue S. Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:55:41 +0000 http://www.davidmazure.com/?p=71#comment-264 Dave, I think you should withhold your personal comments about your work when you are asking for our opinion. What, am I going to do, totally diss a print you call "a favorite"? I think not. As far as the other comments posted, I'm apparently not well read enough because I have no idea what any of you are talking about! I'm with 'Mom' on this one...I continue to be impressed by all of your interesting prints. Dave, I think you should withhold your personal comments about your work when you are asking for our opinion. What, am I going to do, totally diss a print you call “a favorite”? I think not. As far as the other comments posted, I’m apparently not well read enough because I have no idea what any of you are talking about! I’m with ‘Mom’ on this one…I continue to be impressed by all of your interesting prints.

]]> By: ward Klemer http://www.davidmazure.com/2008/10/20/jungian-whim/comment-page-1/#comment-263 ward Klemer Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:56:59 +0000 http://www.davidmazure.com/?p=71#comment-263 "Philosophers have a hard time figuring out what I am saying and what I am denying.My refusal to play ball with my colleagues is deliberate of course, since I view the standard Philosophical terminology as worse than useless - a major obstacle to progress since it consists of so many errors" Daniel tennett "The Message is: there is no Medium" “Philosophers have a hard time figuring out what I am saying and what I am denying.My refusal to play ball with my colleagues is deliberate of course, since I view the standard Philosophical terminology as worse than useless – a major obstacle to progress since it consists of so many errors”

Daniel tennett “The Message is: there is no Medium”

]]> By: Mom http://www.davidmazure.com/2008/10/20/jungian-whim/comment-page-1/#comment-262 Mom Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:51:21 +0000 http://www.davidmazure.com/?p=71#comment-262 Glad to see that your hard work is being shown all over the country. Keep up the good work! I'm very impressed with all your interesting prints. Glad to see that your hard work is being shown all over the country. Keep up the good work! I’m very impressed with all your interesting prints.

]]> By: David Mazure http://www.davidmazure.com/2008/10/20/jungian-whim/comment-page-1/#comment-255 David Mazure Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:49:16 +0000 http://www.davidmazure.com/?p=71#comment-255 Kyra: It is actually based on The Algorithm of Consciousness set forth by Daniel Dennett in the book, 'Consciousness Explained.' Kyra: It is actually based on The Algorithm of Consciousness set forth by Daniel Dennett in the book, ‘Consciousness Explained.’

]]> By: Kyra http://www.davidmazure.com/2008/10/20/jungian-whim/comment-page-1/#comment-253 Kyra Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:37:37 +0000 http://www.davidmazure.com/?p=71#comment-253 Mine too! I love the mess of it. It is one of your "free-er" works for lack of a better word. Love the chaos. Mine too! I love the mess of it. It is one of your “free-er” works for lack of a better word. Love the chaos.

]]>